Category Archives: BOT

Board of Trustees Meeting Blog
Occasional reports on meetings of COD’s Board of Trustees and committees, particularly those of concern to faculty. For complete coverage of Board meetings, access the live streams and/or the recordings of meetings. For more information, visit the COD Board of Trustees website.

PT Counselors Comments to the BOT | April 27, 2023

CHERYL BAUNBACH-CAPLAN

Hello.  My name is Cheryl Baunbach-Caplan. I have been a part-time counselor at College of DuPage for almost 19 years and am president of the College of DuPage Adjuncts Association.

I was a first-generation college student raised in a working-class family on the south side of Chicago who received a full scholarship to attend the University of Illinois. My gratitude for that educational opportunity inspired me to work for 40 years in higher education helping others achieve their academic goals and career dreams.

Tonight, you will also hear comments from some of my colleagues. We are 18 part-time counselors and 8 part-time program advisors who have worked at COD between 4 – 18 years and have been told the College will eliminate our positions. 

Our longevity at the College – particularly when the Board packet often features employee resignations after less than a year – is testimony to our dedication, experience, and professionalism.  And yet the College seems not to value this.

The College wants to employ a case management model to improve student success. But case management does not necessitate FT advisors only. If the administration collaborated with our department, we could develop a comprehensive model to improve retention and graduation around the existing departmental structure, utilizing the expertise of counselors and advisors already in place. Yet, they have never asked us to work with them to develop such a model.

In fact, with many populations, we already employ case management. Jessica Dyrek and I work with the UIUC Engineering Pathways students.  Since we joined the Pathways team, the success rate has increased significantly.  The need for emotional support and counseling for these students is high given the pressures of carrying 16-19 credits of difficult STEM courses each semester.   And although not all Pathways students make it to UIUC, the overwhelming majority transfer somewhere. 

If the College eliminates all part-time counselor positions it will cut our department’s counseling staff by more than half in full time equivalents. We believe this an unwise and dangerous decision when, according to the American College Health Association, over three-quarters of college students in 2022 experienced moderate to serious psychological distress. 

I ask the Board, the administration, and the public to listen to our narrative tonight.  

Collaboratively, with the leadership of our administrators and our expertise in helping many thousands of students achieve their academic dreams, we can craft a model for student success that addresses the unique and diverse needs of all our students.

Collaboration matters.   Thank you.

MICHELLE MOLINA

My name is Michelle Molina and I am a licensed clinical professional counselor. I have worked at College of Dupage for 5 years and have been a counselor in the community college setting for over 10 years. I am also a community member and have two junior high children in COD’s 502 district.

The counselors and advisors call on the Board of Trustees to require the College to conduct an analysis of the impact related to eliminating part-time counseling and advising positions and creating full-time advising positions only. We are asking for specific details about how management’s plan will benefit students and improve student retention and graduation rates.
Strategic Planning Matters

In response to the COVID pandemic, the College implemented multiple teaching modalities and other innovative initiatives to address the diverse ways students want to learn. What the pandemic taught us is one-size does not fit all. Why then does the College believe a one-size approach to providing counseling and advising fits our diverse student body?
Diversity and Equity Matters

The pandemic had a profound impact on the junior high, high school and College learning experience across the country and in our community. Students who enter COD in fall 2024 started high school in a COVID environment. We don’t know what impact this might have on their need for additional guidance and support. What we do know is that a large number of students talk to us about the negative impact the pandemic had on their academic preparation and personal well-being. Administrators collaborated with district 502 superintendents about mental health issues in their elementary, junior high, and high school to help COD prepare for the challenges that lie ahead.
Students Matter

Recent data suggests that student mental health is declining. During the 2020-2021 academic year, more than 60% of college students met the criteria for at least one mental health issue, according to the Healthy Minds Study, which collected data from 373 campuses nationwide. Why would College of DuPage students be different? With gun violence on the rise nationwide, including on college campuses, what danger is posed by not having robust mental health support on campus?
Safety Matters

Reviewing data provided by the College, in 2021, 5887 students changed their program of study. In the first three months of this year, 1289 students changed their program of study. In order to receive financial aid, a student must declare degree intent. This results in students often choosing a degree that comes to mind first but is not necessarily their intent. Counselors and advisors estimate close to half of the students we meet with are undecided based on what they tell us. And yet the College believes we have only about 2000 undecided students and has presented no plan on how FT advisors, aligned with Pathways, will support undecided students.
Data Matters

Collectively, the 28 part-time counselors and advisors represent 211 years of experience in counseling and advising, not to mention our additional experience in higher education management, teaching, and other areas.
Experience and Expertise Matters

The responsible and ethical choice for the College of Dupage is to keep our part-time counselors and advisors.
Counseling and Advising DOES Matter

CHRISTINE JANDAK

My name is Christine Jandak and I am the Program Advisor for both the Education and Early Childhood Education and Care Programs here at College of DuPage. I am also a resident of district 502. I have worked at COD for 10 years and 5 have been in my current role in counseling and advising. I, like many of my part time counselors and advisors have had the honor of being nominated by students as Advisor of the year. To say that I love my job is an understatement.

We as program advisors are housed in the same offices as our full time faculty members. We participate in discipline meetings, advising sessions, articulation meetings, and transfer meetings and specialized college events which suit our programs. We are experts in our respective areas. COD has 8 program advisors Tara and Lynn cover all areas of health sciences. We have Peter in Business and Technology, Nazia in Computer information Systems and Computer internetworking Systems, Anika in Business, Kelly in Human Services, and Lisa in Interior Design, Fashion Studies, and Cosmetology. We are relationship builders, problem solvers, and course planners, for our students and faculty in our areas. We prepare students for completion of Associates in Applied Science degrees and Associates of Arts or Science. We help students plan for employment opportunities, transfer options, prerequisites and more. We provide information to students in areas like Hesi exams, differences in computer languages, Education licensure requirement with Illinois State Board of Education, DCFS, and Gateways, and how to earn certificates in our areas as well. We are built in support systems.

Our programs do not have a typical student. Some are right out of high school, some have some college, some have completed degrees. Our students are full-time, part-time, half time or one at a time and we support them all in navigating their schedules and lives both in and out of Cod. In my programs, especially on Mondays, students have the opportunity to see the collaboration between Program Advisor and faculty. We strategically plan and talk through questions and concerns together with the student in ways we would not be able to if we were not sharing an office suite. The expertise in our areas that we have developed over the years, as well as our collaboration with program faculty and staff, allows us to provide excellent student service. 

However, not all of us are able to work full-time.  Much of this expertise will be lost, and long established relationships destroyed, if the College eliminates our positions.  Our programs are growing and are successful with a blend of both full and part time employees. Instead of moving ahead with the elimination of all part-time positions, we ask that the College work in collaboration with those of us in Counseling and Advising to develop a model to improve student success that allows dedicated program advisors to continue in their jobs, whether full time or part time, and remain with the faculty in the departments that they work with. 

Part time employees matter.

ALISON GREENE

My name is Alison Greene, and I am a part-time counselor. I have worked at this college in a few different roles for over 20 years, and it is like my second home. I am a first generation student and community college alumni myself. 

I choose to work part-time because my husband has healthcare benefits and it allows me to volunteer and give back to my community outside of work.

I don’t understand why the college wants to eliminate part-time counselor and advisor positions. Caseloads could easily be calculated by how many hours are worked. And, if we do go by a caseload model centered on Pathways, not all programs will have the same number of students. Part-time employees would be able to fill in by covering those partial caseloads.

I am very supportive of academic success and open to changes that benefit students, but I don’t think enough research has been done to identify the needs of our students at College of DuPage.

Our students are more complex than academic career pathways and academic plans. This college has a lot of diversity, and many of our students come to us for guidance in various ways.

Over the years, I have met many first-generation immigrants, returning adults, and students with special needs. More than half of the students I see are undecided. These students don’t walk in the door ready to enter an academic program. For some students, this decision takes time, and it takes trying things out and talking to someone about their options.   In fact, most of us meet with approximately 10 students per month for whom Academic Program change requests are processed. 

We also see a lot of students on academic probation or suspension due to failing grades that are often caused by personal events in their lives. These students need even more guidance and support to return to school and succeed.

Without understanding what we do, you might think that advising and counseling should be separated. But if you met with students, listened to them, and respected them, you would realize that achieving student success takes more than just choosing courses and hounding them to stay on task. Many are working, in relationships, raising families, paying bills, and balancing multiple issues. By blending counseling and advising, we can best serve the whole student.

It surprises me that the college would consider the inhumanity of removing counseling from advising when mental health issues are so high among our college student population. When counselors advise, they effectively serve the whole student, particularly when working with special populations, probation, and undecided students who need more attention than those with a designated career pathway.

Please consider developing a comprehensive plan that allows us to work part-time or full-time to serve our students in the best way possible. 

Support systems matter.

Thank you for your time.


KYLE COSENTINO

My name is Kyle Cosentino and I have been a part time counselor at the College of DuPage for the past 9 years. I also work as therapist in private practice where I specialize working with trauma utilizing EMDR. I feel very passionate about counseling and believe in the mental wellness of the students who go to this school.

Over the years, I have worked with many students at COD who have been struggling with mental health issues.  Some of the issues include depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and PTSD to name a few. In my experience, these issues can lead a student to not be able to attend class, get their homework completed on time, make friends, and in some cases be of harm to themselves. It is because of these reasons and more that I believe in maintaining the counseling department at COD.

While I have had many significant experiences with students here, there is one interaction I have had that I will never forget. A few years ago, I started to see a student here for personal counseling. This student had multiple health issues and was severely depressed. One day, this student was brought over to our department by a teacher because she was in crisis. The student met with Michelle Molina, Erin Fabrizio, and me. Upon conversing with this student, we came to the determination that she needed to be hospitalized because the student was actively suicidal. Fortunately, because of the actions we took that day I am happy to report that the student made it safely to the hospital and received the treatment she needed. A few weeks later, that student sent us a thank you card that I found incredibly meaningful. She wrote:

“Thank you guys so much for helping me through my time of need. I appreciate your rapid response and the support that was given to me. Words cannot fully describe just how grateful and lucky I am to have such amazing resources and a safe place to go to in a time of need. Starting next week, I will be in a PHP program to help me gain more strength and skills. Thank you, thank you, thank you”

With the elimination of part time counselors, I would feel very concerned for the safety and wellbeing of students as advisors cannot fulfill this role. I would highly encourage administration to collaborate with our department so that we may keep this essential service for our student population. Mental Health Matters at COD. Thank you for your time.

ERIN FABRIZIO

My name is Erin Fabrizio and I am a part-time counselor. I have a Masters in Clinical Mental Health Counseling, and am a licensed professional counselor of 13 years eligible for clinical licensure. Currently, I am one of three designated counselors who work with the athletes here at COD, specifically, I advise and counsel the m/w cross country & track teams (National Champs!), m/w volleyball (National Champs!), and the newly added m/w lacrosse teams. Between me and my athletic counselor colleagues Sue Brodie and Dr. Dana Thompson, we have 53 years of experience in advising and 63 years in counseling. Sue Brodie and I also participated in collegiate athletic programs, she at DePaul and I at the University of Illinois.

Like all college students, athletes are challenged with academic rigor, tests, homework, etc. Many of them have jobs outside of school. Some athletes need academic accommodations. Some have international student status. Many are first-generation. But athletes have unique challenges as well. The existence of their daily practice and game and travel schedules requires them to level-up the efficiency of their time management and study skills because NJCAA eligibility rules require credits and grades at a certain quantity and quality. Their social lives are on the court or field because there is little time during a season to add this luxury to their calendar. Those who have played a sport know the pressure that comes with representing your school in such a visible format, and so many times, their challenges are silently held, in a competitive I-can-do-this-on-my-own type of attitude because unfortunately there is still a stigma to seeking mental health services, especially in sports where vulnerability is considered weak.

Dana, Sue, and I talk to these athletes about their classes, yes. But because of the rapport we have built with them, they also open up to us about their relationships, their home life, their career aspirations. We are currently working a successful holistic case management model. We counsel them personally, we advise them academically, and we help put them on a path to become successful once their collegiate athletic journey is over. Given the capacity to do all three of these functions, the college has already positioned us to provide the best service to these athletes, no matter their academic pathway.

Did you know that athletes in season must be enrolled fulltime by the 15th calendar day of a regular 16-week semester to participate this Spring, but starting in Fall it is the 18th calendar day? There are so many nuances to credits and eligibility that it is unreasonable to expect every pathway advisor to know these NJCAA rules in and out. Just as it is unreasonable for a students-first institution to ask these students to add more touch points into their impossibly busy schedules. And finally, it is inefficient to disregard the passion and years of experience that my athletics colleagues and I have by asking us to no longer perform functions for the many students who are asking us for help in these areas. Athletics Matters. Thank you.

AMANDA NOEL

My name is Amanda Noel; I have worked as a part-time Student Success Counselor for 9 years. I have been a Licensed Clinical Professional Counselor for the past 15 years, taught Career Management and Psychology classes at another university, and served a 1-year term as President of the Illinois Career Development Association. I came to the college with extensive experience and passion for career and personal counseling, SEEING how both areas impact a student’s academic pathway, coursework, and success. Providing ALL of these services allows me to see the WHOLE student and serve the WHOLE student.

On March 9th, Dr. DelRosario and Dr. Curtis-Chavez joined our Counseling meeting. Administration claimed that students do not have a person, and case management was the solution. Their solution is to separate academic advising from career and personal counseling. I want to give you examples of our holistic approach to Counseling.

I met a student at a New Student Advising and Registration session. He met with me 13 times and sent many emails. As an undecided student in each advising session, I incorporated career development strategies to help him develop his path. When Logan faced personal obstacles, he reached out to me. “I know I can trust you.” With the proposed model, I would have needed to refer him for career and personal counseling. Instead, I saw him as a whole person. I was his GO-TO for career, personal, and academic counseling, and he graduated! 

I met with a student who enrolled at COD to be close to his dying mother.    We met 8 times, including academic and personal counseling, as he processed the grief after her death. He was scheduled with another counselor for personal counseling and returned to me saying, “You know me. I don’t have to start over.” Through personal AND academic counseling, he had a person who helped him process his grief, achieve his education goal, and successfully transfer.

41% of my appointments this month were with students who requested to meet specifically with me. This is documented in our scheduling system. Yet, administration does not believe our students have a person. I want to know where that data is coming from.

Board of Trustees, I beg you to ask those questions and dig deeper into their answers. Visit our department. Talk to the students that actually SEE US!

Continuity Matters.

DANICE MCGRATH

GOOD EVENING–Thank you all for being here, and for your commitment to COD.

 My name is Danice and I am a Licensed Professional counselor. 

I’ve worked at COD for 12 years. and I’m here to share my concerns about the plan for our department.  

Part-time counselors and program advisors will be replaced with Advisors who are assigned to a specific academic pathway.

Our current structure gives ALL students access to a credentialed counselor who can provide academic, career, and personal counseling and we pair these services with our talented program advisors, who are experts in various academic areas.  This is an essential capability for our department. Academic, Career, and Personal needs are not silos that exist independently. Virtually every conversation I have with a student touches on all three. 

So when does academic advising become personal counseling? It’s not black and white. It’s in the nuance of every appointment we have with students. AND this makes perfect sense because a student’s academic life is significantly impacted by their personal life and vice-versa. 

Yet, the line between academic advising and personal counseling will be starkly drawn under the model. One can argue that the academic advisor will only need to refer a student to a credentialed counselor.  In theory, that makes sense. But it’s not that simple.

 A referral is a conversation stopper at the very moment the student may feel comfortable opening up. A referral is an additional step for the student to take. 

 A referral is a rather cold and unsympathetic approach to a student who may want to talk about what they are feeling at that moment.  Worse, who will we refer to when we lose 18 counselors?

This model, centered on Academic Pathways ALSO ignores the fact that many of our students come to COD not knowing what they want to study or change their minds while they are here.  Many students CHOOSE COD specifically because they want to explore academic interests before committing to a career or four-year institution.

 A student may come to COD with plans to study psychology but change their mind after taking an elective culinary course.  Under this model, students change advisors when they change pathways; if they change pathways again, they are assigned yet another advisor.

Many of their peers at four-year universities aren’t required to declare their major until sophomore year. Why are we setting different expectations for our students?

COD is full of opportunity. We owe it to our students to offer counseling and advising resources that are experts on the full breadth of what COD has to offer. COD is full of opportunity.  Assigning students by academic pathways SIMPLY does not work for so many of our students.

This team – that I am so proud to be a part of – is valuable because we possess a wide variety of expertise. We take a holistic approach, which is what our students deserve.

Can we improve? Yes, Always – but PLEASE let’s work together to make improvements that will REALLY benefit our incredible students at COD.

UNDECIDED STUDENTS MATTER.

Prof Dennis Emano Comments to the BOT | April 27, 2023

Good evening. My name is Dennis Emano. I am one of 2 mental health counselors at COD, and I have been with the college for 17 years. I am also a licensed clinical psychologist.

May is Mental Health Awareness Month. Counselors have planned a series of events to raise awareness. But here’s the problem, we are at capacity for the remainder of the term. As much as we want to see students requesting to meet with us, we don’t have enough openings. This is partly due to the fact that in the past few years we have lost 8 part-time counselors and advisors and 3 full-time counselors, whose positions have not been replaced. In my estimation, that’s 250 hours a week of lost student contact time. The ironic part is that we are promoting our counseling services during a time when we are already at capacity and need to refer students out. To make matters worse, the administration is eliminating part-time counselors.

The college conducted a mental health survey last year, and the biggest take away is that students want more mental health services. However, we lack the staff to meet their needs.

The survey also shows that 15% of respondents report experiencing suicidal thoughts, 55% report depression, and 80% report anxiety–among other mental health issues.

After you weaken counseling services by eliminating the part-time counselors, guess who will be left to deal with these students when the few remaining counselors are at capacity? Faculty, the deans, the staff. How is that ethical? Telehealth cannot replace the counselor on campus helping faculty with their distressed student. So please don’t ask them to take a number because there aren’t enough counselors available.

The Mental Health Early Action on Campus Act mandates that colleges, like COD, raise mental health awareness on campus. One of the purposes of this law is to increase access to support services and clinical mental health services on campus. However, I ask this, How do you increase access to mental health services when you plan to eliminate all the part-time counselors? To me, this is a direct violation of the law. It is a disaster waiting to happen. Furthermore, it is unethical–going against one of the most important values declared by this college that states, “We expect the highest standard of moral character and ethical behavior.”

I believe there is another solution to the problem of counseling access and availability, but eliminating part-time counselors is certainly not one of them. So I urge to please listen to the voices you’re hearing tonight about the importance of counseling for our students.

Thank you.

Prof Michael Duggan Comments to the BOT | April 27, 2023

My name is Dr. Michael Duggan and I have been a counselor for Students with Disabilities here for nearly 20 years. The students, faculty, and many of the administrators in this room mean the WORLD to me. Truly, they are like a second family. I want to take advantage of this time and rather than rehash the points made previously I want to highlight the great things that have come out of this area that seems to be under the colleges microscope. When the quarantines of COVID were over, this was the first group of student service professionals meeting with students, not behind plastic glass, but masked in our enclosed offices. Although we were scared, we immediately stepped forward because our students needed us.

Some other highlights:

Part-time Counselor Danice McGrath in Honors, advising over 250+ annual honors scholarship recipients transferring not only to our top universities, but with a host of scholarships as well.

Part Time Counselor Cheryl Baunbach-Caplan does the same for our Engineering Pathways.

Part-time Counselor John Popik co-chairs our Safe Zone Committee for LGBTQ inclusiveness, where we’ve trained over 800 educators since the committee’s inception 15 years ago.

Athletic Couselors Sue Brodie and Erin Fabrizio are a second mother to hundreds of athletes, many coming from out of state and far away from their families, providing the wisdom and encouragement to move onto greater things.

First generation support groups, UndocuAlly Student Support Training, Autismerica, The Coach Program for Students with Intellectual disabilities. The list goes on and on.

There is INCREDIBLE talent here. There are dynamic, student-centered professionals who are dedicated to only one thing, changing students’ lives. Yet at the same time, morale in my area is abysmal. People are scared about their future jobs, and details have been vague and too unspecific. They deserve better. Even more saddening, they’re looking at other job opportunities and likely soon leaving. The loss of talent so deeply saddens me, not because it’s insurmountable, but I know ultimately students will suffer the price after such a loss of collective talent. Hell, I just did a reference call for someone today.

There is still hope. The talent is still here. Both in Counseling, and with the Administrators at this meeting. I believe in us all. TRULY the current way we’re trying to solve this problem isn’t working, but there is still time to change course. Let us truly come together, not with attorneys, or at conferences, or behind closed doors, but in collaboration with open minds and hearts. I believe we can find a solution that treats our employees as as well as we want our students to be treated. There is exceptional talent and wisdom both within our Administration and this amazing group of fellow counselors and I KNOW we can to this if we just work together. I believe in us all.

Prof Christopher Miller Comments to the BOT | April 27, 2023

Good evening. My name is Dr. Christopher Miller. I am a full-time faculty member for the department of speech communication at College of DuPage, and I have also been honored with College of DuPage’s Outstanding Advisor Award. I want to start by stating that I am extremely grateful for this award and more importantly to the student or students who took the time to nominate me.

I have been teaching at College of DuPage since 2002 and during that time I have experienced a number of challenging issues. However, I decided to come to you about this issue because it truly means a lot to me.

Although I have been honored with it, I don’t feel like I have “earned” this award. I do not feel this way as a way to practice humility, rather I feel this way because although I advise students, I feel less like an advisor and more of an armchair therapist.

Currently, I am actively advising, 8-12 students, but these students don’t need me to figure out classes or to help me navigate their transition to a communication or education major, rather they are coming to me with real issues. Issues that I just don’t know how to handle. And to be honest: I don’t know what I’m doing. I’m listening. I think that’s good, but I’m a speech teacher. I have a Bachelor’s and Master’s in Communication from Northern and I have a Doctorate in Curriculum and Instructional Leadership, also from NIU, but I’m not a licensed therapist.

I’ve attended a number of “meetings” in my life for personal issues. Moreover, I actively see a therapist, luckily because I have this particular job, but I’ve also learned, quite clearly, in those meetings, and from my therapist, to stay in my lane. I should only be giving advice on things that I know about and my students are coming to me, today, with issues that I have no experience. And I’m afraid that one of us is going to get hurt.

And that is why I am here.

I need help. Nine years ago, I made a personal decision to start asking for help. Now that I’m 50 years old, I even further understand the benefits by simply asking for help. As an faculty member of this college, I will ALWAYS keep my door open for my students and I’m ALWAYS going to listen to their stories, but I don’t know how to decompress from these stories. I think that’s part of a therapist training, but I don’t have that training. Instead, I take those stories home with me. I don’t think that’s good practice.

We need help. We need help transitioning from the effects of mass social isolation and an individual’s unique personal experience with that transition. We need help. Our students need help. I need help and I pause to say, but I believe we all need help. We were alone, for a couple of years people, now we are together again. For some, and it seems, a lot, of us are struggling with this transition. Rather than lose these essential workers, I implore the Board to LOAD this campus with mental health counselors. My students need them. I need them. You need them.

I am grateful to all of you for allowing me the opportunity to speak to you tonight.

Prof Scott Banjavcic Comments to the BOT | April 27, 2023 (delivered by Prof Carley Bennett)

Hi, I’m Prof. Carley Bennett, incoming discipline chair for the Physics department. I am here tonight to address you on behalf of the Engineering Department Faculty whom I work closely with (and whose students I support). Prof. Scott Banjavcic, Engineering Discipline Chair asked me to give these remarks on his behalf (unfortunately, he couldn’t attend this evening).

Over the past 7-10 years the Engineering Department has been extraordinarily well supported by Part-Time Counselors Cheryl Baunbach-Caplan and Jessica Dyrek. Every year we are tasked with advising up to 500 students who are interested in the Associate’s in Engineering Science degree. Students pursuing engineering have a variety of different options: civil, mechanical, industrial, electrical, computer, computer science, biological, and chemical, that each have a specific set of coursework associated with being able to transfer and achieve the Bachelor’s Degree. Following the correct “path” in terms of coursework is the ONLY way to achieve success, and each of those types of engineering has a different set of required classes.

We are fortunate to have three full-time faculty in the department that are experts in civil, mechanical, and electrical engineering. If the advising was left to these faculty alone, one 30-minute advising appointment each semester for the students pursuing would take approximately 250 hours per semester. For reference, that would be over half of the semester’s office hours for every engineering faculty member spent solely on advising for the department. There is a long list of required activities to make a successful department: most importantly helping students with their courses, but also recruiting, program development/review, committees, and on and on. There is no conceivable way to spend half of the faculty time on advising.

Enter the counseling/advising department. We have been fortunate that Part-Time counselors Cheryl and Jessica (and others) have spearheaded course selection and counseling activities for the engineering students. The years and passion that it took for these two to become experts in our coursework, which is extremely nuanced, has exceeded a decade. They have spent many hours outside of work learning how to advise our students and counsel the needs of engineers (we have a broad range of neurodiverse students interested in our degree).

It is important to stress that the needs of these students extend outside of course selection, and the mental health challenges that we have seen since the pandemic have increased ten-fold. What Cheryl and Jessica do for our department is truly a labor of love, and it has had significant effect.
The result of their efforts has been an increase in the success rate of our Engineering Pathways students from 30% to over 40%. For reference, most top-tier engineering programs have a success rate of 30%, so 10% better than our peers is nothing short of a miracle. This kind of result isn’t possible without them.
The decision to eliminate Part-Time counselors will have a dramatic effect on our program. You cannot replace the decades of experience that these wonderful employees bring to our students.
As discipline chair, I would like to personally implore the Board of Trustees to put a price on the institutional knowledge that walks out the door if the plan that has been proposed by the administration is allowed to be implemented.

Please do not punish the stellar individuals that are diligently and passionately doing the work of this college on behalf of the students. Thank you!

Prof Debra Smith Comments to the BOT | April 27, 2023

Good evening, I’m Debra Smith. I have been a faculty member at the College of DuPage for 20 years. I have a little different perspective to offer you tonight. I have been the Nursing & Health Sciences Liaison Librarian, as well as the Library’s liaison to Students with Disabilities and the liaison for Access & Accommodations for most of my time here. So I’d like to address the mental health issue here on campus from my perspective. Within the Library we see meltdowns at our reference desks, in our public bathrooms, in corners, in our offices, much like our Faculty colleagues.

As a matter of fact, usually during Board meetings, I’m at home doing family time with my future COD student–he’s got a few years yet before he gets here–but tonight I needed to come and talk to you because my COD family is suffering. I’m here to represent my brothers and my sisters in CODAA and in CODFA, and the COD staff, because we are struggling with the amount of our students that have issues that, with the exception of our counseling colleagues, we don’t have the skills to support. I go through boxes and boxes of Kleenex, not because I have seasonal allergies, but because my students are breaking down with anxiety issues and stress issues. I routinely hear that they have to wait two to three weeks before they can get in to have a counseling appointment.

I’d also like to share with you that for many years I have served on the College’s Academic Regulations Committee. We are a private group of faculty members that meet and review student petitions for grade changes because of extraordinary circumstances. And I say “private” because we represent the whole Faculty and we see the students’ petitions and the supportive documentation that students provide to us that are confidential. I’m speaking to you today to let you know that the amount of petitions that are coming through our Committee, where the problem is mental health-based, and they have documentation, is staggering. And it is concerning. And, It. Is. Downright. Scary. And that’s the documented cases. There are also a lot of undocumented cases, where, if people were just well enough to provide us with the evidence that they need to support their petitions, those too would be approved.

So, please listen to the suggestions, and take time before you implement a decision that, I fear, could lead to the injury of our staff. Our students. Our community.

Thank you for your time.

Prof Jackie McGrath Comments to the BOT | April 27, 2023

When Trustee Dan Markwell was elected in 2017, COD was in crisis and the path to save our school was rocky and chaotic. It was a time period when I dreaded waking up and walking down my driveway to pick up my morning Chicago Tribune, wondering if our school would be on the front page once again. At the time, he told a reporter for the Naperville Sun, “My top priority as a trustee is working to make sure the Higher Learning Commission gives COD a full accreditation in November,” he said. “A lot goes into that — board policy, transparency issues need to be addressed.”

He fulfilled that priority and more. Along the way, he demonstrated that it is possible to be a calm, reasonable, diplomatic and highly informed trustee, even in the face of conflict and controversy. His honesty and commitment to solving problems persuaded even Tea Party skeptics to respect his voice, and his focus on students and public education values made a difference in so many crucial ways. I want to express how grateful I am for his work, and the time, care, common sense, and intelligence that went into it. We’re not done yet, but there is no question: Trustee Markwell helped save our school, and I will always be grateful for his time as a trustee. Thank you.

Prof Robert Moorehead Comments to the BOT | March 16, 2023

It is very unfortunate that I am here today, addressing you in public session, in front of god and everyone, with a 3-minute timer counting down.

10 months ago, after being denied promotion to E range, 6 of my colleagues and I filed appeals with FARB, the faculty administrative review board. This was a first in the history of the college. Never had so many faculty appealed at the same time. This should have been a sign that something was amiss in the promotion process.

For 10 months we followed the appeal process. We finally received detailed, preliminary findings in December.

In February, FARB issued its recommendations to President Caputo, who, per the contract, had 10 instruction days to respond. And it’s here that the train goes fully off the tracks.

President Caputo unilaterally decided that FARB didn’t actually finish its work in February. Instead, unbeknownst to the administrators and faculty on FARB, it finished back in December.

This petty dispute between President Caputo and FARB is harming faculty. While the president debates with FARB over whether its meetings were actually meetings, and which recommendations were its final recommendations, faculty are left on the sidelines. We get denied an opportunity to meet with you, the board, because the president retroactively decided the timeframe for us to meet with you had ended one month prior.

And what happens with FARB’s recommendations? The administrators and faculty on FARB unanimously agreed on their report. This report documents in detail how the promotion process violates the board policy of equity. It also provides details on how to improve the process. Much of this was also in the December report. And the president has chosen to ignore it.

How is it in the best interest of the college to ignore a report on such an important process?

We have also heard that any changes to the promotion process have to be negotiated in the new contract. But what happens to the faculty who are right now awaiting the outcome of their applications for promotion? You know the process is broken, but you won’t fix it. The current process violates the contract. Nothing in the contract requires a broken process, and nothing in the contract prevents fixing it.

As this process has dragged on and on, faculty who have been here far longer than I have approached me and commented that they have never applied for promotion because they don’t trust the process. That shows this broken process is harming both faculty and the college as a whole. Why don’t we fix it?

CODFA Pres Goldberg Comments to the BOT | March 16, 2023

Good evening,

My name is David Goldberg. I teach political science and am proud to serve as the president of the College of DuPage Faculty Association. I am also a resident of the district.

Tonight it is my honor to extend a heartfelt congratulation to four candidates recommended for tenure. The awarding of tenure is a significant accomplishment in the career of a faculty member. The first of what we all hope will be a career filled with accomplishments.

Beyond the students and departments who will benefit from these new faculty, their tenure contributes to strengthening the College of DuPage as an institution.

The hiring of new faculty and awarding of tenure is an investment by the Board of Trustees, and the community they are elected to represent, in the future health of the institution and confidence in our ability to successfully continue to realize our primary reason for existence: to educate the residents of District 502.

Four new faculty is a smaller number than in years past.

It begins to feel like a “faculty hunger games.”

Four retirements in the counseling department over the past five years, with one replacement faculty.

A lot of attention is currently paid to mental health. The emotional well-being of our students.

COD received in excess of $20 million in state and federal assistance to help during and after the COVID epidemic.

How many new full-time faculty have been hired to address the growing mental health crisis with the embarrassment of riches?

One. One person.

Faculty and other college employees who interact with students on a regular basis see the impact of the crisis, and beyond our individual faculty efforts, it feels like there is little institutional effort to address this.

It cannot be addressed solely by software fixes, technological fads or AI bot scripts.

It cannot be addressed by stackable credentials in mixology and sewing.

It cannot be addressed by well-intentioned slogans on a t-shirt.

It can be addressed by devoting the required existing resources to strengthen the faculty who exist to serve the needs of students.

Let’s keep the hunger games to the realm of film and literature and stop cannibalizing for unclear purposes.

Finally, I would like to congratulate the painters, groundskeepers, mechanics & carpenters association and the administration for coming to an agreement nearly eight months into negotiations.

Thank you.

CODFA VP Arnott-Hill Comments to the BOT | March 16, 2023

Hello and good evening.

My name is Elizabeth Arnott-Hill. I am a professor of psychology and the vice president of the faculty association.

I am pleased to see four of my colleagues recommended for tenure tonight and heartened to note that their tenure recommendation is properly tied to the student success component of our strategic long-range plan. I hope it goes without saying that student success, a term we hear a lot these days, is not possible without a strong and well-supported faculty. Faculty are fundamental to student success. We certainly aren’t the only piece of the puzzle, but we are an essential one.

In recent years, the number of full-time faculty hired and subsequently approved for tenure has declined. We have core disciplines, like math, which is down approximately 10 positions from a decade ago. Faculty who provide essential services to our students, like our counseling team, are down a number of positions, even though demand for their services has steadily increased. At the same time, faculty are being asked to do more work outside of the classroom, often in the name of student success.

Each month, the board hears presentations from my faculty colleagues about their outstanding work for the college – new grants, new programs and certifications, community outreach programs, OER textbooks, field study and study abroad programs, and accomplishments with student clubs. This is work that supports our students and promotes COD in the community. As our ranks diminish and our workload increases, our ability to engage in this high impact work is restricted. If our goal is student success, it is imperative that our numbers remain adequate to serve our student population directly. We also need adequate faculty so that the hours we devote to implementing the initiatives developed at the administrative level are distributed in such a way as to not to take away from the time we have for our students. Fewer full-time faculty plus more hours devoted to new initiatives does not add up. Additionally, it is essential that such college wide plans are vetted in a way that increases the likelihood that they will have demonstrable positive effects, that they are given adequate time for implementation, that concrete data regarding impact is clearly communicated, and that initiatives which are determined by evidence to be without merit are discarded.

As we look ahead, it is imperative to not only think about making changes that are flashy and disruptive, but also to remember that we can’t ignore the fundamentals. Our institution is only as strong as the quality of education that we provide. And quality education requires faculty.